Because “human nature was assumed, not absorbed”,1 in the mysterious union of the Incarnation, the Church was led over the course of centuries to confess the full reality of Christ’s human soul, with its operations of intellect and will, and of his human body. In parallel fashion, she had to recall on each occasion that Christ’s human nature belongs, as his own, to the divine person of the Son of God, who assumed it. Everything that Christ is and does in this nature derives from “one of the Trinity”.
The Son of God therefore communicates to his humanity his own personal mode of existence in the Trinity. In his soul as in his body, Christ thus expresses humanly the divine ways of the Trinity:2
The Son of God … worked with human hands; he thought with a human mind. He acted with a human will, and with a human heart he loved. Born of the Virgin Mary, he has truly been made one of us, like to us in all things except sin.3
Apollinarius of Laodicaea asserted that in Christ the divine Word had replaced the soul or spirit. Against this error the Church confessed that the eternal Son also assumed a rational, human soul.4
This human soul that the Son of God assumed is endowed with a true human knowledge. As such, this knowledge could not in itself be unlimited: it was exercised in the historical conditions of his existence in space and time. This is why the Son of God could, when he became man, “increase in wisdom and in stature, and in favor with God and man”,5 and would even have to inquire for himself about what one in the human condition can learn only from experience.6 This corresponded to the reality of his voluntary emptying of himself, taking “the form of a slave”.7
But at the same time, this truly human knowledge of God’s Son expressed the divine life of his person.8 “The human nature of God’s Son, not by itself but by its union with the Word, knew and showed forth in itself everything that pertains to God.”9 Such is first of all the case with the intimate and immediate knowledge that the Son of God made man has of his Father.10 The Son in his human knowledge also showed the divine penetration he had into the secret thoughts of human hearts.11
By its union to the divine wisdom in the person of the Word incarnate, Christ enjoyed in his human knowledge the fullness of understanding of the eternal plans he had come to reveal.12 What he admitted to not knowing in this area, he elsewhere declared himself not sent to reveal.13
Similarly, at the sixth ecumenical council, Constantinople III in 681, the Church confessed that Christ possesses two wills and two natural operations, divine and human. They are not opposed to each other, but co-operate in such a way that the Word made flesh willed humanly in obedience to his Father all that he had decided divinely with the Father and the Holy Spirit for our salvation.14 Christ’s human will “does not resist or oppose but rather submits to his divine and almighty will.”15
Since the Word became flesh in assuming a true humanity, Christ’s body was finite.16 Therefore the human face of Jesus can be portrayed; at the seventh ecumenical council (Nicaea II in 787) the Church recognized its representation in holy images to be legitimate.17
At the same time the Church has always acknowledged that in the body of Jesus “we see our God made visible and so are caught up in love of the God we cannot see.”18 The individual characteristics of Christ’s body express the divine person of God’s Son. He has made the features of his human body his own, to the point that they can be venerated when portrayed in a holy image, for the believer “who venerates the icon is venerating in it the person of the one depicted”.19
Jesus knew and loved us each and all during his life, his agony and his Passion, and gave himself up for each one of us: “The Son of God … loved me and gave himself for me.”20 He has loved us all with a human heart. For this reason, the Sacred Heart of Jesus, pierced by our sins and for our salvation,21 “is quite rightly considered the chief sign and symbol of that … love with which the divine Redeemer continually loves the eternal Father and all human beings” without exception.22
GS 22 § 2.
Cf. Jn 14:9-10.
GS 22 § 2.
Cf. Damasus 1: DS 149.
Lk 2:52.
Cf. Mk 6 38; 8 27; Jn 11:34; etc.
Phil 2:7.
Cf. St. Gregory the Great, “Sicut aqua” ad Eulogium, Epist. Lib. 10, 39 PL 77, 1097 Aff.; DS 475.
St. Maximus the Confessor, Qu. et dub. 66 PG 90, 840A.
Cf. Mk 14:36; Mt 11:27; Jn 1:18; 8:55; etc.
Cf. Mk 2:8; Jn 2 25; 6:61; etc.
Cf. Mk 8:31; 9:31; 10:33-34; 14:18-20, 26-30.
Cf. Mk 13:32, Acts 1:7.
Cf. Council of Constantinople III (681): DS 556-559.
Council of Constantinople III: DS 556.
Cf. Council of the Lateran (649): DS 504.
Cf. Cal 3:1; cf. Council of Nicaea II (787): DS 600-603.
Roman Missal, Preface of Christmas I.
Council of Nicaea II: DS 601.
Cal 2:20.
Cf. Jn 19:34.
Pius XII, Enc. Haurietis aquas (1956): DS 3924; cf. DS 3812.